Laws against Housing Discrimination
- Landlord - Tenant
- Discrimination
- Laws Against Housing Discrimination
base-search.net
Laws Against Housing Discrimination
Federal Law
State Law
What is Prohibited?
Special Provisions for People with Disabilities
Discrimination against Families with Children
Exemptions to the Fair Housing Act
Enforcement Provisions and Penalties for Violations of the Law
Federal law prohibits discrimination in the leasing, sale, marketing and funding of housing on the basis of your race, color, religious beliefs, gender, national origin, family status, i.e., pregnancy or having custody of a child under age 18 or impairment. Maryland and much of its local jurisdictions have at least comparable laws, as well as additional protections.
The national policy against housing discrimination is defined in the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968. In addition, there are arrangements in the Civil liberty Act of 1866 which the Supreme Court of the United States has actually interpreted as prohibiting "all racial discrimination, private along with public, in the sale or rental of residential or commercial property." Unlike the 1968 law, the 1866 law consists of no exceptions and no limit on the amount of damages which can be granted to a plaintiff.
Who is Protected?
The federal Fair Housing Act is consisted of in Title VIII of the Civil Liberty Act of 1968. It was changed in 1974 and once again in 1978. The Fair Housing Act restricts housing discrimination against an individual who falls in any of the following seven groups. Anyone treated unjustly because of: race, color, religious beliefs, nationwide origin, sex, families with children and individuals with impairments (handicap). These 7 groups are thought about "safeguarded classes" under the Act and its changes. "Protected classes" mean the classifications of discrimination that are covered by the law.
Read the Law: The Fair Housing Act of 1968 (42 USC 3601, et seq.)
The courts have stated that Maryland's law is "significantly comparable" to the federal law. In two crucial aspects, Maryland gives more defense. First, Maryland broadens on the protected classes of the federal law. You can not be discriminated versus since of your marital status, gender identification, sexual preference, or source of earnings.
Marital status is specified as "the state of being single, married, apart, separated or widowed." "Sexual orientation" suggests the recognition of a private regarding male or female homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality. Gender identity is specified to imply the gender related identity, appearance, expression, or behavior of an individual, no matter the individual's designated sex at birth. In addition, there is a limit to the exemption for rooms or units in a house in which the owner inhabits an unit as his/her principal home. In Maryland, these owners may deny someone based on sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or marital status. However, they can not discriminate versus someone since of his/her race, color, religion, family status, nationwide origin, special needs, or income source.
Read the Law: Md. Code, State Government, § 20-101, 20-704, 20-705
Local jurisdictions (such as the counties or towns) likewise safeguard all of the groups covered by federal and state law and often include extra classifications such as age (in Baltimore City, 18 or older), sexual choice, profession and income. See regional law posts.
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to dedicate any of the following acts against an individual who falls within any of the groups protected by the law.
Sale or Rental of Residential Real Estate - Refuse to offer, rent or otherwise make unavailable or deny any house; discriminate in the terms or conditions of sale or rental of a dwelling or in the arrangement of services or facilities. (Single sex housing is allowed, as an exception to this prohibition, in scenarios where sharing of living locations is included.); or show that housing is not offered when, in fact, it is.
Advertising Residential Real Estate - Make, print, publish or trigger to be made, printed or released, a notice, declaration or ad relating to the sale or leasing of housing that shows a preference, restriction or discrimination.
Block Busting - Persuade or attempt to convince, for profit, a person to sell or lease a home by making representations about the present or future entry into the area of one or more persons in a safeguarded class.
Loans and Other Financial Assistance - Discriminate in the making or buying of loans or offering other monetary support.
Brokerage and Appraisal Services - Discriminate in the brokering or appraisal of residential realty.
Participation in Real Estate Organizations - Deny access to, or establish various terms and conditions for, subscription or participation in any numerous listing service, property brokers' organization or other service, organization or facility relating to the service of selling or leasing of houses.
Intimidation, Coercion and Threats - Intimidate, push, threaten or disrupt a person in among the protected classes in enjoyment of rights conferred by the Fair Housing Act.
Special Provisions for People with Disabilities
Definition of Disability
The Fair Housing Act specifies impairment (handicap) as a physical or psychological problems that considerably restricts one or more of an individual's "significant life activities", a record of having such a problems, or being considered as having such a problems. The law safeguards both the individual with a special needs and a person living with or planning to cope with that individual. It leaves out individuals who are unlawfully using or addicted to drugs and other illegal drugs.
Special Protections - In addition to offering people with impairments all of the defenses versus housing discrimination that are provided to members of the other six secured classes, the list below provisions of the Fair Housing Act offer essential additional protection.
Read the Law: 42 United States Code § 3602
The prohibition versus discriminating in the terms of sale or rental, forbids a property manager from asking any concerns of a person with a special needs than would be asked of any other applicant. A property manager might not, for instance, ask about the nature or seriousness of an individual's special needs or ask whether that person can living alone.
Reasonable Accommodations
It is illegal to refuse to make such affordable changes in rules, policies, practices and services which might be required to manage an individual with a special needs an equivalent chance to delight in and utilize a dwelling. These "sensible accommodations" include such things as making an exception to a "no animals" policy for a person who needs a service animal and providing a booked, designated parking location for a person with a movement impairment.
Reasonable Modifications - It is illegal to refuse to allow a person with a special needs to make, at his/her own expenditure, such sensible changes in the properties as may be needed to allow use and enjoyment of the facilities. "Reasonable adjustments" include such things as installing grab bars to help with use of restroom facilities or the widening of an entrance to accommodate a wheelchair.
Read the Law: 42 United States Code § 3604
Full Accessibility of "New" Multi-Family Housing
Multi-family housing constructed for very first occupancy after March 13, 1991 (i.e. structures consisting of 4 or more systems) should be totally available to people with disabilities. Itaf a structure has an elevator, all units should be available; if there is no elevator, just "ground flooring" systems should be available. "Accessible" suggests:
1. There need to be an available building entryway on an accessible path;
- Public and typical use locations should be readily accessible to and functional by people with disabilities;
- All inside doors should be wide adequate to accommodate a wheelchair;
- There need to be an accessible route into and through the residence;
- Light switches, electric outlets, thermostats and other environmental protections should be available;
- Bathroom walls must be strengthened to enable later setup of grab bars; and
- Bathroom and kitchens should have adequate area to permit maneuvering in a wheelchair.
Read the Law: 42 United States Code 3604(F)
Discrimination versus Families with Children
Definition of "Familial Status" - As used in the Fair Housing Act, the term "familial status" (typically called "households with kids") refers to a parent or another individual having legal custody of several individuals under the age of 18 years. It refers likewise to a person who is pregnant or in the procedure of getting legal custody of a minor child.
Families with kids take pleasure in under the law the very same protection versus housing discrimination as other groups safeguarded by the law. In only 2 circumstances, does the law license, as exceptions, discrimination versus families with children. Both exceptions relate to so-called housing for older persons. Housing planned for and occupied exclusively by individuals 62 years of age or older and housing in which 80 percent of the units are planned for and inhabited by at least a single person who is 55 years of age or older do not need to comply with the law's familial status provisions.
Discrimination versus households with kids manifests itself in lots of ways, the most common of which remain in advertising (e.g. signs that leasings are for "no kids" or "adults just"), limiting occupancy requirements that unreasonably restrict the number of children who might inhabit an offered area, and steering of families with children to separate structures or parts of structures.
Exemptions to the Fair Housing Act
The 4 exemptions to the Fair Housing Act are:
- A single-family house sold or leased by the owner, supplied the owner does not own more than three such single family homes at one time and supplied also that the sale or leasing is not marketed in a discriminatory way and is done without the services of a real estate representative, broker or sales person. If the seller does not live in the home at the time of the rental or sale, or was not the most recent homeowner at the time of the rental or sale, just one sale of such a single-family home within any 24-month period is excused.
- Dwelling systems or spaces in a structure of 4 or fewer systems, supplied the owner of the building occupies one of the systems as his home
- A dwelling owned or operated by a religious company, or by a not-for-profit company owned or controlled by a spiritual organization which restricts or provides preference in the sale, rental or tenancy to persons of the very same religion, offered membership in the religion is not restricted on the basis of race, color or nationwide origin.
- Lodging owned or operated by a personal club as an occurrence to its primary function and not operated for a business function. Club members might be provided choice, or tenancy may be restricted to members, offered club membership is open to all without regard to race, color, faith, and so on.
Read the Law: 42 United States Code § 3603, 3604, 3607
Enforcement Provisions and Penalties for Violations of the Law
State Law
The Maryland Commission on Civil Rights has the responsibility of implementing discrimination laws. The Commission will investigate accusations of housing discrimination and try to solve the problem. Information on submitting a problem and the investigative procedure are readily available on the Commission's website.
Victims of housing discrimination may also file a suit with the appropriate state court.
Read the Law: Md. Code, State Government, § 20-702
Federal Law
HUD Administrative Complaints
A person who believes that s/he has been the victim of housing discrimination may file a written complaint with the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) within one year after the inequitable act happened. The Secretary should inform the complainant of the choice of online forums for dealing with the dispute and if the state or local jurisdiction has a public firm licensed to handle such problems, the Secretary needs to refer the problem to that company.
The Secretary will attempt to moderate the dispute and reach a conciliation contract with the celebrations. If required, the Secretary might ask the Attorney General to seek temporary relief through court action. Under certain conditions, either the aggrieved party or the participant might select to have actually the dispute heard by an Administrative Law Judge or in federal court. An Administrative Law Judge who finds that a participant has actually dedicated a prejudiced housing act might impose a civil penalty of approximately $10,000 for a very first offense, up to $25,000 for a 2nd offense within a five-year period, and up to $50,000 for a third offense within a seven-year duration. If the conflict goes to federal court, the Attorney General will preserve the action on behalf of the aggrieved person. The aggrieved person may sign up with the action and might be awarded reasonable attorney fees.
Private Lawsuits
A person who thinks that s/he has actually been the victim of housing discrimination may file a civil action in the United States or State Court within two years after the discriminatory act took place or ended, or after a conciliation agreement was breached, whichever takes place last, even if a grievance had been filed with HUD, provided that an Administrative Law Judge has not yet begun a hearing. A federal judge may grant whatever relief is necessary, including the award of actual and punitive damages, attorney fees and temporary or irreversible injunctions.
The U.S. Attorney General may intervene in private lawsuits determined to be of public importance.
Lawsuits in "Pattern or Practice" Cases
The U.S. Chief law officer might start a civil suit in any federal district court if s/he has reasonable cause to think that a person has actually engaged in a "pattern or practice" of housing discrimination.
In any fit brought by the Chief law officer, whether on his/her own initiative or by referral from the Secretary of HUD, the judge may award whatever relief is appropriate: a momentary or irreversible injunction or other order, sensible lawyer fees and expenses, cash damages to any aggrieved person and "to vindicate the general public interest", a civil penalty of as much as $50,000 for the first violation and as much as $100,000 for any subsequent infraction.
Read the Law: 42 United States Code § 3613, 3614